Chargesheet Filed in Lucknow Over Alleged Sexual Exploitation and Forced Religious Conversion of KGMU Doctor
Summary of the case and legal action
A chargesheet running to roughly 250 pages has been submitted in a Lucknow court against a former resident doctor of King George’s Medical University (KGMU) and three other individuals in connection with allegations of sexual exploitation and coercive religious conversion of a junior doctor, police officials said. The chargesheet was filed on Friday, and authorities confirm that the probe remains active as evidence continues to be examined.
Deputy Commissioner of Police (West) Vishwajeet Shrivastava told medichelpline that the primary accused faces multiple criminal counts, while his parents and another co-accused have been named for alleged roles in aiding and abetting the offences.
Allegations laid out in the complaint
According to the complaint filed at Chowk police station in December of last year, the junior KGMU doctor accused the former resident of concealing his marital status, sexually exploiting her by promising marriage, forcing her to undergo an abortion, and pressuring her to convert her religion. The complainant also told investigators that, in February of the previous year, the same man had allegedly converted and married another woman doctor.
Investigators contacted the second woman and recorded her statement before a magistrate. During that recorded statement, she reportedly said she had been made to undergo a religious conversion. These statements and the complainant’s allegations form part of the material included in the chargesheet.
Specific charges named in the chargesheet
The Deputy Commissioner stated to medichelpline that the accused doctor has been charged under provisions related to rape, criminal intimidation and forcing religious conversion as set out in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. In addition, the chargesheet invokes Sections 3 and 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. The accused’s parents and the co-accused have been named for allegedly aiding, abetting and harbouring the accused.
A cleric based in Pilibhit, who is alleged to have solemnised a marriage, is not included in the current chargesheet. The officer clarified that the cleric’s role remains under investigation and that a supplementary chargesheet will be filed if evidence linking him to the offences is established.
Evidence collected and investigative steps
The chargesheet, as described by police, incorporates statements from several witnesses alongside forensic analysis of digital evidence seized during the probe. Investigators examined mobile phones and laptop data recovered from the accused and other relevant parties; forensic findings from those devices have been referenced in the court filing.
The inclusion of witness testimony and digital forensic reports indicates the investigation followed standard evidence-gathering approaches used in complex criminal matters, aligning witness accounts with traceable digital records.
Arrests, custody and ongoing inquiries
Police sources say the accused doctor was arrested in Lucknow on January 9. His parents had previously been taken into custody and were later produced before a court and remanded judicially. The co-accused named in the chargesheet has also been dealt with as part of the investigation process.
Officials emphasise that further inquiry is underway. The investigation may expand or result in supplementary filings if additional corroborative evidence is recovered or if statements implicate new actors in the alleged offences.
Legal and procedural context
Filing a detailed chargesheet is a formal step that presents the prosecution’s case to the court based on the evidence collated during the police investigation. By including witness statements, forensic analyses and the specific statutes invoked, the chargesheet frames the offences authorities believe can be substantiated in a criminal trial. The mention of a possible supplementary chargesheet reflects common investigative practice when enquiries continue after an initial filing.
Sensitivity, victim protection and next steps
Given the nature of the allegations—sexual exploitation, pressured abortion and forced religious conversion—officials handling the case have highlighted procedural measures such as recording statements before a magistrate and conducting forensic examinations. These steps are intended to ensure that evidence is documented under legal safeguards and that the complainant’s account is preserved for judicial scrutiny.
The court will now consider the chargesheet and the materials presented. Any further legal proceedings, including framing of charges, additional investigations or supplementary filings, will proceed in accordance with court directions and statutory procedures.
Note: All information in this report is drawn from the chargesheet and statements provided by police officials to medichelpline. No additional or unverified claims have been added.