Madras High Court Upholds Unani Professor’s Appointment

Background of the Case

In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court has upheld the appointment of a Unani professor, dismissing a quo warranto petition that questioned her qualifications and eligibility for the position. The petition was brought forth by a Unani practitioner who serves as an assistant medical officer at a government hospital in Ramanathapuram. This individual had previously worked as an assistant professor at the Government Unani Medical College and Hospital in Chennai.

Allegations and Claims

The petitioner alleged that his transfer was a result of complaints made against him by the professor and others. He argued that the professor was appointed despite not fulfilling the necessary qualifications, and raised concerns about her role as a postgraduate guide and examiner for Unani General Medicine students. He sought to have her removed from the position based on these claims.

During the hearing, Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy reviewed the arguments presented. The petitioner’s counsel accused the professor of falsely stating in an affidavit that she had 10 years of experience, asserting she had no prior teaching experience.

Defense and Supporting Evidence

In her defense, the professor submitted a counter-affidavit claiming to possess 20 years of teaching experience. Additionally, the Principal of the Government Unani Medical College and Hospital supported her assertion by providing an affidavit that confirmed she had over 10 years of teaching experience in medical subjects, which aligns with the relevant regulations.

Court’s Decision

After considering the arguments from both parties, the court dismissed the quo warranto petition, concluding that the allegations regarding the professor’s qualifications were unfounded.

Related Developments

In a related ruling, the Madras High Court directed the State Government to appoint qualified Professors specializing in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, General Surgery, and Orthopaedics to Dean positions in Government Medical Colleges. The court noted that the promotions of these doctors were delayed due to a prior court order and the enforcement of a Model Code of Conduct (MCC) during the 2019 general elections.