Mumbai: Concerns Raised Over ‘Ghost Signatures’ in Pathology Reports
Alarming Discovery of Deceased Pathologist’s Signature
A doctors’ organization has expressed serious concerns regarding the practice of ‘ghost signatures’ on pathology reports in Maharashtra. In a particularly alarming case, a pathologist who passed away on June 23, 2025, was reported to have signed laboratory reports until November 2025. This deceased doctor’s signature appeared on four separate pathology reports from different laboratories, indicating a potential misuse of a qualified medical professional’s name after death.
Investigation Triggered by Insurance Company
The issue came to light when an insurance company detected discrepancies in the lab reports and subsequently informed the Maharashtra Association of Practising Pathologists and Microbiologists (MAPPM). Following this alert, the association conducted a review of the reports and identified four instances where documents were issued under the deceased doctor’s name posthumously.
MAPPM’s Response and Proposed Actions
Dr. Sandeep Yadav, President of MAPPM, commented on the situation, stating, “We will send mail to the authorities. We received information about reports from insurance companies and other citizens.”
Dr. Prasad Kulkarni, an Executive member of MAPPM, highlighted the legal framework surrounding pathology practices, emphasizing that only qualified pathologists are permitted to supervise laboratory operations and validate reports. He noted that many laboratories superficially fulfill these legal obligations by listing a registered pathologist’s name, while in reality, these professionals may not be present or involved in the testing processes.
Neglect of Supervision in Laboratories
“The actual presence of pathologists to supervise lab proceedings is often neglected by many medical professionals. The focus tends to be more on the signature rather than on genuine involvement in the process,” Dr. Kulkarni explained. He pointed out the troubling trend of ‘ghost pathologists’ who lend their names, sometimes from other states, to labs without direct participation.
Previous Incidents of Misconduct
Medic Helpline has reported multiple instances where a pathologist registered in Telangana has been accused of signing reports for various laboratories across Maharashtra without being registered with the Maharashtra Medical Council, which is essential for practicing in the state.
In another recent case, a pathologist’s signature continued to appear on laboratory reports three months after his death, which occurred on November 20, 2025. Reports signed in his name were still being issued in several locations throughout Maharashtra.
Future Actions from the Maharashtra Medical Council
The Maharashtra Medical Council is expected to take action regarding the ongoing issue of ‘ghost signatures’ on laboratory reports, as concerns about ethical practices in pathology continue to grow.